FilmPoker - https://seekingalpha.com/user/49969875/comments; I've played a lot of tournaments at both sites and have had relative success at both, at least as far as cashing goes. Pros will tell you that if you can cash in 15% of the tournaments you play in than you're doing pretty well. When I do get to play, my stats at both sites have me cashing 20-27% of the time. Even when you do cash though, there has to be some bigger ones in there, some deep runs to pay for the ones you didn't cash. In live tournaments it's even more important because you have expenses to pay for as well.
For those that tour the various circuits playing tournaments they have to try and make enough that cover their hotel, travel, food, and any extra-curricular activities they may partake in while not playing. Online, it can be just as important. You still want to be able to make up for your non cashes of course. If you're doing it for a living, then yes you want to be able to pay your rent/mortgage, bills, food, etc. I like playing tournaments online when I can. Lately it's been much harder to do with my busy work schedule and I don't play them when I have my son.
I find that between the two sites I play tournaments on, PokerStars is slightly better than Full Tilt. Full Tilt is better in some categories as well and below are some of the things I like: 1) Number of Available Tournaments - This one easily belongs to PokerStars. They aren't the biggest tournament site online for nothing. There are literally hundreds of tournaments at every level starting every few minutes and you can play a bunch at a time if you're adept at multi-tabling.
At Full Tilt, if you can only afford to play at a certain level you may have to wait for a bit. There is more variety in all those tournaments you can sign up for at Stars too. More turbos, rebuys, 1 rebuy 1 addon, hyper-turbos, deep stack tournies, super stacked tournies...its goes on and on. 2) "Guarantee" tournaments - I like playing these ones and at Stars there are a LOT of them. Basically, a guarantee tournament is one where they list how big the prize pool is and no matter how many entrants there are, that number is the minimum that will be paid out.
If there's a $10K Guarantee for a $10+1 ( the "plus one" is the extra a site takes for themselves. The $10 goes into the prize pool) buy in tournament and only 100 people register? Then that $10K will be divided amongst those that cash. If more people than the minimum required to make a $10K prize pool register, then the prize pool goes up. So, if 2000 people register for that same tournament than the prize pool will be $20K.
If it's not a guarantee tournament, they may require a minimum amount of people to be registered to run the tourney.
Tournament - PokerStars Verses Full Tilt
Arnulfo Busch (2019-01-03)
| Enviar respuesta
FilmPoker - https://seekingalpha.com/user/49969875/comments; I've played a lot of tournaments at both sites and have had relative success at both, at least as far as cashing goes. Pros will tell you that if you can cash in 15% of the tournaments you play in than you're doing pretty well. When I do get to play, my stats at both sites have me cashing 20-27% of the time. Even when you do cash though, there has to be some bigger ones in there, some deep runs to pay for the ones you didn't cash. In live tournaments it's even more important because you have expenses to pay for as well.For those that tour the various circuits playing tournaments they have to try and make enough that cover their hotel, travel, food, and any extra-curricular activities they may partake in while not playing. Online, it can be just as important. You still want to be able to make up for your non cashes of course. If you're doing it for a living, then yes you want to be able to pay your rent/mortgage, bills, food, etc. I like playing tournaments online when I can. Lately it's been much harder to do with my busy work schedule and I don't play them when I have my son.
I find that between the two sites I play tournaments on, PokerStars is slightly better than Full Tilt. Full Tilt is better in some categories as well and below are some of the things I like: 1) Number of Available Tournaments - This one easily belongs to PokerStars. They aren't the biggest tournament site online for nothing. There are literally hundreds of tournaments at every level starting every few minutes and you can play a bunch at a time if you're adept at multi-tabling.
At Full Tilt, if you can only afford to play at a certain level you may have to wait for a bit. There is more variety in all those tournaments you can sign up for at Stars too. More turbos, rebuys, 1 rebuy 1 addon, hyper-turbos, deep stack tournies, super stacked tournies...its goes on and on. 2) "Guarantee" tournaments - I like playing these ones and at Stars there are a LOT of them. Basically, a guarantee tournament is one where they list how big the prize pool is and no matter how many entrants there are, that number is the minimum that will be paid out.
If there's a $10K Guarantee for a $10+1 ( the "plus one" is the extra a site takes for themselves. The $10 goes into the prize pool) buy in tournament and only 100 people register? Then that $10K will be divided amongst those that cash. If more people than the minimum required to make a $10K prize pool register, then the prize pool goes up. So, if 2000 people register for that same tournament than the prize pool will be $20K.
If it's not a guarantee tournament, they may require a minimum amount of people to be registered to run the tourney.
Añadir comentario